Prev | Current Page 409 | Next

Various

"The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe"


This allegation is as baseless as the allegation about our
intention to violate the neutrality of Belgium, and events
have shown it to be so. But it seems to be a rule with Germany
to attribute to others the designs that she herself
entertains; as it is clear now that, for some long time past,
it has been a settled part of her strategic plans to attack
France through Belgium. A statement is inclosed, which was
issued by us on Oct. 14 last, dealing with this point.
This memorandum and its inclosures should provide ample
material for a reply to the German statements.
Foreign Office, Nov. 9, 1914.
* * * * *
Belgian Official Denials.
Here is inclosed a copy of the note of Aug. 3 sent by M. Davignon,
Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs, to Herr von Below Saleske, the
German Minister at Brussels, included in the Belgian "Gray Paper," and
printed in full in THE NEW YORK TIMES of Oct. 18 and reprinted in THE
TIMES'S pamphlet of the war's diplomatic papers. This is the note
expressing the "profound and painful surprise" caused to King Albert's
Government by the German invitation to it to abandon Belgian neutrality
and denying that France had, as alleged by Germany, manifested any such
intention.


Pages:
397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421