Prev | Current Page 408 | Next

Various

"The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe"

The moment
that there appeared to be danger that this treaty might be
violated the British Government made an appeal for an
assurance from both France and Germany, as had been done in
1870 by Mr. Gladstone, that neither of those countries would
violate the neutrality of Belgium if the other country
respected it. The French agreed, the Germans declined to
agree. The appeal made by the British Government is to be
found in our first "White Paper" after the outbreak of the
war.
The reason why Germany would not agree was stated very frankly
by Herr von Jagow, the German Minister for Foreign Affairs, to
Sir Edward Goschen, our Ambassador in Berlin; and it is
recorded in the second "White Paper" that we published. The
attitude of the British Government throughout has been to
endeavor to preserve the neutrality of Belgium, and we never
thought of sending troops to Belgium until Germany had invaded
it and Belgium had appealed for assistance to maintain the
international treaty.
We have known for some years past that in Holland, in Denmark,
and in Norway the Germans have inspired the apprehension that,
if England was at war with Germany, England would violate the
neutrality of those countries and seize some of their harbors.


Pages:
396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420